Women as doctorates
10-18-26
Going back as far as WW2, draftees who had a college degree were made officers; those who didn't have degrees were made private.
After
the war, all of the grunts who saw this happening (as well as the
college educated getting the best jobs post war) raised their kids with
the belief that a college degree with the key to opening most jobs (and,
for a while, it was).
Then college was democratized. People were
allowed to take on debt to fund their education, which means that
college was no longer a place for only the rich and highest of classes.
At
first it worked, because only a few were taking on the risk of debt for
college (or only a few could get the loans in the first place). But as
more and more people got into college (and as standards were lowered to
keep the money rolling in), college stopped being about the smartest
people moving up, but about a filter for those who had the means to
attend in the first place.
As far as the results, it goes back to
my belief that the widespread distribution of unearned status symbols
not only degrades both the recently issued symbols, but those of the
past.
So, if you gain status by being the first on your block to
own a Cadillac, you gain less status if you buy one when most of your
neighbors have one; and eventually you loses status if you're the only
person on your block which DOESN'T have one.
In this case, by
flooding the world with people who are degreed by luck or circumstances
instead of strictly by talent, you call into question everyone else who
has graduated from the same university. (this is also what brings forth
the idea/question brought on recently about seeing a DEI pilot of an
airplane)













No comments:
Post a Comment